Prev | Current Page 138 | Next

Arnold, Matthew, 1822-1888

"Celtic Literature"

. . What though the field be lost?
All is not lost; the unconquerable will,
And study of revenge, immortal hate,
And courage never to submit or yield,
And what is else not to be overcome.

There, surely, speaks a genius to whose composition the Celtic fibre
was not wholly a stranger!
And as, after noting the Celtic Pindarism or power of style present
in our poetry, we noted the German flatness coming in in our hymns,
and found here a proof of our compositeness of nature; so, after
noting the Celtic Titanism or power of rebellious passion in our
poetry, we may also note the Germanic patience and reasonableness in
it, and get in this way a second proof how mixed a spirit we have.
After Llywarch Hen's:-

How evil was the lot allotted to Llywarch, the night when he was
brought forth -

after Byron's:-

Count o'er the joys thine hours have seen -

take this of Southey's, in answer to the question whether he would
like to have his youth over again:-

Do I regret the past?
Would I live o'er again
The morning hours of life?
Nay, William, nay, not so!
Praise be to God who made me what I am,
Other I would not be.

There we have the other side of our being; the Germanic goodness,
docility, and fidelity to nature, in place of the Celtic Titanism.
The Celt's quick feeling for what is noble and distinguished gave his
poetry style; his indomitable personality gave it pride and passion;
his sensibility and nervous exaltation gave it a better gift still,
the gift of rendering with wonderful felicity the magical charm of
nature.


Pages:
126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150