If the capitals are equal, therefore, the one
will give four and twenty times more encouragement and support to the
industry of the country than the other."[322]
If this position of Adam Smith's be tenable, it cannot be true, that the
purchase of foreign commodities encourages British industry as much as
the purchase of British commodities. In order to have a clear idea of
his reasoning it will be useful to repeat some of the leading principles
which regulate and explain the nature of capital. 1. Capital is usually
defined to be the _accumulated stock of the produce of labour_. A
definition which, if not completely satisfactory, is sufficiently
correct for our present purpose. 2. _Capital is essential to
production_. 3. _Capital employed in production is wholly consumed in
the process of production_. "Capital," as Mill, and in fact as every
political economist says, "is all consumed; though not by the
capitalist. Part is exchanged for tools or machinery, which are worn out
by use; part for seed or materials, which are destroyed as such, by by
being sown or wrought up, and destroyed altogether by the consumption of
the ultimate product. The remainder is paid to labourers, who consume it
for their daily wants; or if they, in their turn, save any part, this
also is not generally speaking, hoarded, but (through savings banks,
benefit clubs, or some other channel) re-employed as capital, and
consumed.
Pages:
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860